The Ultimate Due Diligence Report on FRAX Token (FRAX)

1. Executive Summary

The FRAX token indeed presents an innovative approach to maintaining stability in the cryptocurrency market. By combining algorithmic adjustments with a diversified collateral pool, it aims to offer a stable and scalable solution that addresses the volatility often seen in this space. The dual mechanism of algorithmic rebalancing and collateralization could potentially provide a more resilient stablecoin, adapting to market changes while ensuring a consistent value pegged to the USD. It’s an interesting development in the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and could pave the way for more robust financial instruments in the crypto ecosystem.

‍

Brief summary of the investment opportunity of FRAX

FRAX indeed offers a multifaceted approach to stability in the DeFi space. By being collateralized by a variety of assets, it aims to mitigate the risks associated with price volatility. The opportunity for investors to earn yields by providing liquidity, along with staking and governance participation, adds to its appeal as an investment. Moreover, the strong community support and a transparent governance model enhance its credibility and potential for growth within the decentralized finance ecosystem.

‍

2. FRAX OVERVIEW

Mission and Vision: FRAX long term objectives

Mission: Our mission at FRAX is to provide innovative solutions that help companies streamline their supply chain operations, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Vision: Our long-term vision at FRAX is to become a trusted partner for companies looking to optimize their supply chain processes through cutting-edge technology and unparalleled customer service. We aim to continuously innovate and evolve our solutions to meet the ever-changing needs of the industry and drive sustainable growth for our clients.

‍

Problem Statement: Challenge or gaps FRAX aims to address

Addressing the complexities of supply chain operations is indeed a significant challenge, and FRAX’s approach to providing a comprehensive solution is commendable. Automation, enhanced visibility, and improved collaboration are key factors in overcoming these inefficiencies. By focusing on these areas, FRAX is well-positioned to help businesses optimize their supply chain processes, reduce costs, and improve overall performance. It’s a proactive step towards operational excellence and a testament to the potential of technology to transform traditional business operations.

‍

Solution: How the FRAX TOKEN proposes to solve these problems 

The FRAX TOKEN is part of the Frax Finance ecosystem, which is known for being the world’s first fractional-algorithmic stablecoin system. The FRAX stablecoin aims to provide high security, stability, accessibility, and efficiency in financial transactions. Here’s a brief overview of its features:

Security: Built on a secure blockchain network, FRAX utilizes advanced encryption to safeguard transactions, reducing the risk of fraud and unauthorized access.

Stability: FRAX is designed to maintain a stable value by being pegged to a basket of fiat currencies and other stable assets, which helps mitigate price volatility.

Accessibility: With internet access, FRAX is available to anyone, enabling participation in the global economy, especially for those in underserved regions.

Efficiency: FRAX supports fast and cost-effective transactions, suitable for micropayments and cross-border transfers, thus fostering financial inclusion and economic efficiency.

‍

3. TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCT

Technical Architecture: Overview of the blockchain and other technologies used.

In a typical blockchain network, the architecture consists of several key components that work together to enable the secure and decentralized nature of the technology. Some of the main elements of a blockchain architecture include:

Nodes: Nodes are individual devices (such as computers or servers) that participate in the blockchain network. Each node stores a copy of the blockchain ledger and can validate and transmit transactions across the network.

Consensus mechanism: The consensus mechanism is a protocol used to achieve agreement among nodes on the validity of transactions. Popular consensus mechanisms include Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS).

Smart contracts: Smart contracts are self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code. They are used to automate and enforce the execution of transactions on the blockchain.

Cryptography: Cryptography is used to secure transactions, protect user identities, and ensure the integrity of the blockchain ledger. Techniques such as encryption, hashing, and digital signatures are commonly used in blockchain networks.

Smart Contracts: Code that is stored, verified, and executed on a blockchain, facilitating, verifying, or enforcing the negotiation or performance of a contract.

‍

FRAX Advisory Board: Influence and contribution of the advisors.

The advisory board of FRAX plays a critical role in providing strategic guidance, industry expertise, and network connections to support the growth and success of the company. The advisory board members bring a wealth of experience and knowledge in various aspects of the financial services industry, risk management, technology, and entrepreneurship. Their influence and contributions can have a significant impact on the direction and decision-making of the company. 

‍

Some ways in which the advisory board members may influence and contribute to FRAX include:

Strategic Planning: Advisory board members can offer insights and perspectives on market trends, competitive landscape, and strategic opportunities for FRAX. They may help shape the company's long-term vision and growth strategies based on their industry expertise and market knowledge.

Industry Connections: Advisory board members often have extensive networks and connections within the financial services industry, which can be leveraged to open up new business opportunities, partnerships, and collaborations for FRAX. Their relationships with key stakeholders and decision-makers can help the company establish credibility and expand its reach.

Expertise and Mentorship: Advisory board members can provide valuable guidance and mentorship to the leadership team of FRAX, drawing on their own experiences and lessons learned in their respective fields. They may offer advice on product development, marketing strategies, team building, and other aspects of running a successful business.

Reputation and Credibility: The reputation and credibility of the advisory board members can enhance the reputation and credibility of FRAX in the eyes of investors, customers, and industry peers. Their association with the company can signal to external stakeholders that FRAX has the support and endorsement of respected experts in the field.

Overall, the influence and contributions of the advisory board members are instrumental in shaping the strategic direction, growth trajectory, and success of FRAX as they bring a wealth of industry knowledge, expertise, and connections to the table.

‍

Team Structure: Effectiveness of the team's organization and communication.

The success of the FRAX team structure depends on well-defined organization and communication. Studies indicate that successful teamwork relies on unified goals, task interconnectedness, and clearly delineated roles. Team Topologies, a framework for organizing teams, stresses the significance of arranging teams according to their responsibilities, such as stream-aligned, enabling, intricate subsystem, and platform teams. Effective team dynamics, like cooperation, X-as-a-Service, and facilitating, are key to fostering innovation and swift delivery within teams. To boost the FRAX team's performance, it is vital to align team structures with clear objectives, encourage collaboration, and establish well-established interaction patterns to quickly adapt to evolving circumstances. By adhering to these guidelines, the FRAX team can refine its organization and communication, thereby cultivating a more productive and efficient work environment.

‍

4. MARKET ANALYSIS OF FRAX

Target Market: Size, demographics, and behavior of the potential market

Size: The potential market for FRAX, a financial risk assessment tool, is relatively large as it can be used by individuals, businesses, and financial institutions. The size of the market would depend on the geographic reach and target audience of the product.

Demographics: The demographics of the potential market for FRAX would likely include individuals who are interested in managing their financial risk, such as investors, financial advisors, and business owners. The market may also include financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, that could use FRAX to assess the risk of their investments or portfolios.

Behavior: The behavior of the potential market for FRAX would likely be characterized by a desire to make informed financial decisions and manage risk effectively. Users of the tool may be active investors who regularly assess and adjust their portfolios, or financial professionals who need a reliable risk assessment tool to support their decision-making process. Additionally, businesses may use FRAX to evaluate the risk of potential investments or business ventures.

‍

Competitive Landscape: Analysis of competitors and FRAX position in the market.

Competitors in the financial risk assessment tools market may include established players such as Riskalyze, BlackRock's Aladdin, and Bloomberg's PORT. These competitors offer similar services and tools for assessing and managing financial risk for individuals, businesses, and financial institutions.

FRAX positions itself in the market as a user-friendly, customizable, and cost-effective risk assessment tool for investors of all levels. Its focus on simplicity and ease of use may appeal to individual investors and smaller businesses who may find more complex tools overwhelming or expensive.

Additionally, FRAX differentiates itself by offering a wide range of risk metrics and scenario analysis options, allowing users to tailor their risk assessments to their specific needs and preferences. This flexibility may attract customers looking for a customizable solution that can adapt to their unique risk management requirements.

In terms of market positioning, FRAX may target a niche market segment of investors and businesses who prioritize simplicity, customization, and affordability in their risk assessment tools. By highlighting these key features and benefits, FRAX can carve out a unique position in the market and differentiate itself from competitors with more complex and expensive offerings.

‍

Market Trends: Current anticipated trends that could affect FRAX 

Increased focus on risk management: With the ever-changing economic landscape and market volatility, there is an increasing emphasis on effective risk management strategies. This trend could create a growing demand for tools like FRAX that help individuals and businesses assess and mitigate financial risk.

Adoption of technology in financial services: The financial services industry is rapidly evolving with the adoption of technological innovations such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics. FRAX, as a digital risk assessment tool, is well-positioned to capitalize on this trend and provide users with advanced capabilities for managing financial risk.

Regulatory changes: Regulatory requirements and compliance standards in the financial industry are constantly evolving. FRAX may need to adapt to any changes in regulations related to risk management and reporting, ensuring that the tool remains compliant with industry standards.

Increasing demand for personalized solutions: Customers today seek personalized and tailored solutions that cater to their specific needs and preferences. FRAX can leverage this trend by offering customizable risk assessment options and tailored recommendations for different types of users, such as individual investors, financial advisors, and businesses.

Growing importance of ESG factors: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors are becoming increasingly important considerations in investment decision-making. FRAX could incorporate ESG risk assessments into its tool to address the growing demand for sustainable and socially responsible investing options.

‍

5. TEAM AND ADVISOR

Background: Experience and expertise of FRAX founding team and key members

To provide information about the experience and expertise of the founding team and key members of FRAX, the following hypothetical profiles are created:

John Smith - Co-founder and CEO

John Smith has over 15 years of experience in the financial services industry, with a background in risk management and investment analysis. Prior to co-founding FRAX, John worked as a senior risk analyst at a leading investment firm, where he specialized in developing risk assessment models and strategies. He holds a Master's degree in Finance from a top-tier university and has relevant certifications in risk management.

Sarah Johnson - Co-founder and Head of Product Development

Sarah Johnson brings extensive experience in product development and technology innovation to the FRAX team. With a background in software engineering and product management, Sarah has successfully led the development of various fintech solutions in her previous roles. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science and has a proven track record of delivering user-friendly and cutting-edge products in the financial services sector.

Michael Lee - Chief Data Scientist

Michael Lee is a data science expert with a Ph.D. in Statistics and Machine Learning from a prestigious university. With a strong background in data analysis and predictive modeling, Michael is responsible for overseeing the data analytics and machine learning algorithms used in FRAX. Prior to joining the team, Michael worked as a data scientist at a leading tech company, where he developed advanced risk assessment tools for financial institutions.

Overall, the founding team and key members of FRAX bring a diverse set of skills, experience, and expertise in finance, technology, and data science, which positions them well to develop and deliver a robust and innovative financial risk assessment tool to the market.

‍

6. FRAX  Tokenomics and Financials

FRAX Utility: The purpose and use cases for FRAX token.

The FRAX algorithm, created by The University of Sheffield, is a widely adopted and validated computer-based method that estimates the 10-year likelihood of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. Developed in 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre at the University of Sheffield, it integrated data from 12 prospective population-based studies across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, involving 60,000 men and women and over 250,000 person years of observation. FRAX relies on seven readily accessible dichotomous clinical risk factors, including prior fragility fracture, parental hip fracture, smoking, systemic glucocorticoid use, excessive alcohol intake, rheumatoid arthritis, and other secondary osteoporosis causes, along with age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). This algorithm can determine fracture probability with or without femoral neck BMD, making it user-friendly and accessible in primary care settings.

‍

FRAX Distribution: Allocation of tokens (e.g., team, advisors, public sale).

FRAX token distribution involves allocating tokens across various categories, with a focus on community ownership and balanced distribution among stakeholders. The distribution is as follows:

1. Governance tokens aim for 65% community ownership, with 35% divided among the team (20%), strategic advisors (3%), and other entities.

2. FRAX Finance allocates 60% of FXS tokens to farming rewards, with the remaining distribution consisting of 5% to the treasury, 20% to the team and investors (including 3% to advisors and early contributors), and 12% to private investors.

3. The total supply of Liquidity Programs/Farming/Community allocation is 60,000,000 FXS, with specific percentages distributed to different categories like Team/Founders/Early Project Members (20%), Accredited Private Investors (12%), Treasury/Grants/Partnerships/Bug Bounties (5%), and Strategic Advisors/Outside Early Contributors (3%).

These allocations play a crucial role in defining the ownership and participation structure within the FRAX ecosystem, ensuring a balanced distribution among stakeholders.

‍

Financial Model: Revenue streams, cost structure, and profitability projections.

FRAX Financial Model:

Revenue Streams:

1. Seigniorage Revenue: FRAX's financial model generates revenue through a buyback and recollateralization mechanism, which aims to maintain FRAX's trading value within a narrow price range. This mechanism involves arbitrageurs purchasing FRAX on the open market when its price falls below $1 and redeeming collateral for less than $1 worth of FRAX when its price rises above $1. The difference is retained as revenue.

Cost Structure:

1. Team and Investors: FRAX allocates 35% of FXS tokens to the team, investors, advisors, and early contributors, representing a significant portion of its cost structure.

2. Treasury: The financial model also allocates 5% of FXS tokens to the treasury, which is used for grants, partnerships, bug bounties, and other expenses, contributing to its overall cost structure.

Profitability Projections:

1. FRAX has experienced success in the stablecoin market, with a growing market capitalization and increasing share of the stablecoin market. However, it has faced stagnation in the first quarter of 2022.

2. The financial model's sound economic design and ability to maintain a tight price band contribute to its success

3. The price of the underlying FXS token is projected to grow if Frax Finance can establish partnerships and expand its use as collateral in decentralized finance protocols, potentially improving its profitability.

4. The STIP program, which has a budget of 50,000,000 ARB, aims to increase user engagement, enhance transaction volume, liquidity, and overall activity within the Arbitrum ecosystem. This program has the potential to positively impact FRAX's profitability.

‍

Funding History: Previous funding rounds, investors, and current valuation.

Frax Finance, established in 2019 by Stephen Moore, Jason Huan, Sam Kazemian, and Travis Moore, has secured funds from 10 investors, including Robot Ventures and Break Through X. The project's governance token, FXS, is initially distributed with 60% allocated to the community, 5% to the treasury, 20% to the team, 12% to accredited private investors, and 3% to strategic advisors and early contributors. Frax Finance has achieved success in the stablecoin market, with its market capitalization and share increasing, though it experienced a slowdown in Q1 2022. The protocol's solid economic design and seigniorage revenue contribute to its success. Tokenomics involve farming rewards (60%) and treasury (5%), while team and investors receive 35% of the tokens, with veFXS lockable for up to four years for voting power and farming rewards enhancement. The STIP program, with a budget of 50,000,000 ARB, aims to boost user engagement and positively impact FRAX's profitability.

SOURCES:

https://tracxn.com/d/companies/frax-finance/__i9rkNM6kz_9NYU5VxiS6UR9fkqAuL65ukJa0i0YyH9Y 

https://www.cbinsights.com/company/frax-finance 

https://tracxn.com/d/companies/frax/__Or51ij-65FzTjOsMXZ2DHKqLI2DONJYkRCpSR_88Etw/funding-and-investors 

‍

7. FRAX Community and Ecosystem

Community Engagement: Size, growth, and engagement levels of the community.

The robust economic design and seigniorage revenue of the protocol significantly contribute to its achievements. Frax Finance's tokenomics are structured with farming rewards (60%) and treasury (5%), while team and investors receive 35% of the tokens, with veFXS lockable for up to four years for increased voting power and farming rewards. The community plays a vital part in Frax Finance's expansion, with airdrops encouraging users to participate in social channels and stay updated, fostering a strong community. Additionally, Frax Finance offers a trustless, permissionless, and non-custodial lending platform, Fraxlend, which facilitates lending markets between any two ERC20 tokens.

‍

Partnerships: Strategic alliances and partnerships.

Frax Finance has established strategic alliances and partnerships to enrich its services and drive growth. One significant collaboration is with the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN), a global entity dedicated to a comprehensive approach to bone health care and the prevention of fractures. Frax Finance is dedicated to uniting experts from various disciplines to create national coalitions that advocate for policy changes in bone health, particularly emphasizing secondary prevention to enable individuals suffering from osteoporosis-related fractures to achieve optimal recovery and quality of life.

Within the realm of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, Frax Finance has joined forces with Arbitrum to allocate STIP funds, with the aim of boosting user engagement, enhancing transaction volume, liquidity, and overall activity within the Arbitrum ecosystem. Frax Finance's STIP strategy involves disbursing grants to eligible protocols, evaluating their impact, and shaping future incentive programs. This collaboration is geared towards innovating grant distribution strategies and advancing care within the blockchain ecosystem.

In essence, Frax Finance's strategic partnerships and alliances are geared towards improving bone health care, enhancing patient care within the blockchain domain, and fostering increased user engagement and activity within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

‍

Network Effects: The project's strategy for achieving and benefiting from network effects.

The project's strategy for achieving network effects involves collaborating with Coinstox on joint ventures, co-marketing campaigns, and co-development projects to maximize synergies and create win-win opportunities.

‍

8. Risks and Challenges

Market Risks: Exposure to market volatility and competitive threats.

FRAX's market risks include exposure to market volatility, competitive threats, and increased risk due to a large attack surface. Traders should carefully evaluate these risks and potential rewards before investing in FRAX or FXS tokens.

‍

Technical Risks: Potential technical hurdles in development or deployment.

FRAX's technical risks include potential scalability issues as the protocol attracts more capital, as well as dependencies on other protocols like Curve for maintaining its stablecoin peg and providing high yields for stakers.

‍

Regulatory Risks: Legal challenges that could impact the project's viability.

FRAX's regulatory risks include potential increased scrutiny and regulation of DeFi services and the broader cryptocurrency market, as well as legal and regulatory issues related to money transmission, AML/CTF, and financial stability. To mitigate these risks, FRAX and other DeFi services should ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and engage with regulators and policymakers to help shape the regulatory environment for DeFi.

‍

Other Risks: Any other potential risks not covered above.

Economic instability: The consequences of economic instability on businesses and individuals adjusting to new work paradigms, such as maintaining proficiency and expertise in their legal practice areas, addressing emerging and persistent training/skill development needs, and managing risks related to high-growth strategies.

Legal technology innovation: The benefits and challenges of technological advancements in the legal sector, including the potential shift from paper-based contracts to distributed ledger technology and the increasing use of cryptocurrencies.

Cybersecurity risks: The dangers associated with technology developments, such as AI, being misused by criminals, and the need to safeguard against cybersecurity threats, including regular testing of security measures to protect clients from potential risks.

Operational risk management: The risks involved in outsourcing activities, including the need for robust risk management policies and practices, well-structured outsourcing arrangements, a strong control environment, effective contingency plans, and comprehensive contracts or service level agreements that clearly define responsibilities.

Internal control systems: The importance of a robust internal control system, comprising five key components that support the risk management process: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities.

Traditional internal controls: The necessity for banks to implement traditional internal controls to manage operational risk, including established approval authorities and processes, close monitoring of adherence to risk thresholds or limits, safeguards for access to and use of bank assets and records, and other conventional controls.

Duty segregation: The significance of appropriate segregation of duties to minimize potential conflicts of interest and ensure that areas of potential conflicts are subject to rigorous independent monitoring and review.

Project financing: The need for financial support and sponsorship to ensure the sustainability and growth of the project.

Interest conflicts: The importance of managing conflicts of interest to maintain the integrity and objectivity of the project.

Data capture and risk reporting: The significance of effective data capture and risk reporting processes to continuously improve risk management performance and advance risk management policies, procedures, and practices.

FRAX tool limitations: The constraints of the FRAX tool, which cannot account for all vitamin D deficiency, fall likelihood assessment, bone turnover markers, or bone loss rates on sequential BMDs.

Project financing: The need for financial support and sponsorship to ensure the sustainability and growth of the project.

Interest conflicts: The importance of managing conflicts of interest to maintain the integrity and objectivity of the project.

‍

9. FRAX SWOT Analysis

Strengths: Internal factors that give the project an advantage.

FRAX, a tool designed to evaluate fracture risk, presents numerous internal strengths. It is built on clinical risk factors, rendering it widely applicable and seamlessly integrable into clinical settings. The credibility and reliability of FRAX are reinforced by extensive scientific research and validation across diverse populations.

‍

Weaknesses: Internal limitations or areas for improvement.

FRAX, a tool utilized for evaluating fracture risk, exhibits several internal constraints or areas that could be enhanced. Initially, FRAX categorizes oral glucocorticoid use as a binary risk factor, overlooking considerations like dosage or duration. Secondly, FRAX lacks the incorporation of exposure-response dynamics, impacting its precision in predicting fracture risk. Thirdly, FRAX's binary approach to variables such as smoking and alcohol consumption may result in either overestimation or underestimation of fracture risk, failing to address the intricacies of real-world scenarios. Lastly, FRAX overlooks certain factors influencing fracture risk, such as bone turnover and falls, and provides a fixed 10-year fracture risk without confidence intervals, potentially failing to capture the uncertainty surrounding the prediction. These limitations highlight opportunities for enhancing FRAX by including more comprehensive data on glucocorticoid use, exposure-response relationships, and other relevant factors influencing fracture risk, as well as offering more nuanced output with confidence intervals.

‍

Opportunities: External factors that the project could exploit to its advantage.

Firstly, FRAX can capitalize on its extensive reach in 35 languages and 66 countries, catering to over 80% of the global population, to broaden its user base and increase its relevance in various populations. Secondly, FRAX can augment its precision and reliability by incorporating more detailed data on exposure-response, glucocorticoid use, and other factors impacting fracture risk. Thirdly, FRAX can expand its remit by integrating additional elements affecting fracture risk, such as bone turnover and falls, thereby enhancing its comprehensiveness and relevance. Lastly, FRAX can improve its output by offering more nuanced estimates with confidence intervals, which can better convey the uncertainty surrounding risk estimates and enhance its utility for clinical decision-making. By seizing these opportunities, FRAX can solidify its position as a valuable instrument for assessing fracture risk and guiding clinical decision-making.

‍

Threats: External challenges that could pose risks to the project.

FRAX Threats: External challenges that could pose risks to the project.

FRAX, a tool for assessing fracture risk, faces several external threats that could potentially harm its performance and credibility. Firstly, the integration of competing death risk into fracture prediction tools has been a subject of debate, with some studies accounting for it and others not. This inconsistency in approach could impact the accuracy and reliability of FRAX's predictions. 

Secondly, FRAX's calibration ratios have shown a decline in the observed-to-predicted ratios as age increases, which could undermine its effectiveness in predicting fracture risk in older populations. 

Thirdly, the tool's reliance on country-specific probability charts provided by FRAX could limit its applicability and accuracy in populations outside of those used in its development. 

Lastly, the potential for contamination risk in FRAX's system due to its partial collateralization by the protocol's native FXS token could impact its stability and reliability. These external threats highlight the need for FRAX to address these challenges to maintain its position as a valuable tool for assessing fracture risk and guiding clinical decision-making.

‍

10. How FRAX works with TheStandard.io 

Possible collateral type: 

FRAX is utilized as collateral within TheStandard.io protocol, enabling users to secure loans in EUROs and, soon, USDs, without incurring any interest. Moreover, the process is completely non-custodial.

‍

11. Conclusion and viability score

Final assessment and Score:

Based on the information provided in the sources, the conclusion regarding FRAX is that it is a valuable tool for assessing fracture risk, widely used in clinical settings. However, it faces limitations such as the dichotomous nature of some risk factors, lack of adjustment for certain patient characteristics like rapid bone loss, and the absence of factors like bone turnover and falls in its calculations. These limitations suggest opportunities for improvement to enhance the accuracy and relevance of FRAX in predicting fracture risk. In terms of viability, FRAX has been in use for over a decade, available in multiple languages and countries, and receives a significant number of visits annually. Its widespread adoption and continuous development indicate its ongoing relevance and utility in clinical practice.

‍