Page 16

‍

Next: Section 5 – Market & Competitive Analysis begins with 5A – Target Market and Use Cases

‍

5. Market & Competitive Analysis – Bitcoin (BTC)

A. Target Market and Use Cases ( – Deep Institutional Analysis)

‍

To understand Bitcoin’s long-term investment potential, one must evaluate not just its tokenomics, but its market relevance and utility across global economic sectors. Bitcoin is no longer merely a peer-to-peer transaction mechanism—it has matured into a macroeconomic asset class with multiple, distinct use cases spanning individual consumers, institutions, financial markets, and nation-states.

‍

This section offers an institutional-grade dissection of Bitcoin’s target market verticals, the problems it solves, and its expanding application domains. It analyzes how Bitcoin’s value proposition aligns with real-world economic pain points, providing clarity on why and how capital is flowing into this asset class at an accelerating pace.

‍

1. Store of Value (SoV): Hedge Against Currency Debasement

‍

Primary Target Market: Individuals, families, institutions, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds.

‍

Problem Solved: Fiat currency debasement and systemic inflation.

‍

Fiat currencies lose purchasing power over time due to central bank expansionary policies. Over the past 50 years, the U.S. dollar has lost over 85% of its purchasing power (CPI-adjusted).

‍

Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized issuance make it the first globally accessible, digital, inflation-resistant asset, rivaling gold but with superior portability, auditability, and divisibility.

‍

It is increasingly being adopted as:

‍

A generational wealth preservation tool (family offices),

‍

Corporate treasury reserve (e.g., MicroStrategy, Tesla),

‍

A sovereign diversification asset (e.g., El Salvador, Central African Republic).

‍

This alone positions Bitcoin as a $10 trillion+ opportunity, should it achieve monetary parity with gold.

‍

2. Medium of Exchange (MoE): Borderless, Censorship-Resistant Payments

‍

Target Market: Unbanked populations, cross-border remittance users, gig economy workers, e-commerce platforms, politically restricted regions.

‍

Problem Solved: Friction in global payments and financial exclusion.

‍

Traditional payment systems (e.g., SWIFT, Western Union, ACH, PayPal) are:

‍

Expensive (avg. global remittance cost ~6.25% – World Bank),

‍

Slow (3–5 days),

‍

Geopolitically censored (e.g., sanctions, banking bans),

‍

Inaccessible to 1.4 billion unbanked adults globally (World Bank Global Findex Report 2021).

‍

World Bank Remittance Reference

‍

Unbanked Population Data

‍

Bitcoin enables:

‍

Real-time, low-cost global payments via Lightning Network,

‍

Peer-to-peer remittances without intermediaries,

‍

Humanitarian funding without political interference,

‍

Merchant payments (BitPay, OpenNode, Strike).

‍

Strike Remittance Case Study: https://strike.me 

Lightning Payments in Practice: https://bitcoinbeach.com 

‍

Bitcoin becomes a financial lifeline where fiat infrastructure fails.

‍

3. Unit of Account: Microeconomies and Early Monetization

‍

Target Market: Local Bitcoin economies, Lightning-based apps, high-inflation economies.

‍

Problem Solved: Price instability and fiat volatility.

‍

Although USD remains dominant globally, Bitcoin is emerging as a unit of account in:

‍

El Zonte (Bitcoin Beach), where products are priced in BTC,

‍

Lightning-enabled gaming platforms (e.g., ZEBEDEE),

‍

Argentina and Lebanon, where inflation rates exceed 100% annually.

‍

ZEBEDEE Platform: https://zebedee.io 

Bitcoin Circular Economies: https://bitcoinbeach.com 

‍

This role may seem marginal now, but early monetization precedes full monetary adoption, echoing gold’s transition from store of value to global unit of account.

‍

4. Collateral in Financial and Derivatives Markets

‍

Target Market: Traders, lending platforms, hedge funds, DeFi protocols.

‍

Problem Solved: Need for non-sovereign, censorship-resistant collateral.

‍

BTC is increasingly used as pristine collateral for:

‍

Derivatives on CME, Deribit, Binance Futures,

‍

Collateralized lending on platforms like Ledn, Unchained Capital, Nexo,

‍

BTC-backed mortgages (e.g., Milo Finance),

‍

Tokenized BTC used in DeFi lending pools (WBTC, tBTC).

‍

Collateral usage reduces reliance on fiat-based assets and creates new forms of monetary intermediation using Bitcoin as trustless value layer.

‍

Milo BTC Mortgage: https://www.milocredit.com 

Ledn Lending: https://ledn.io 

WBTC in DeFi: https://wbtc.network 

‍

5. Reserve Asset for Sovereigns and Institutions

‍

Target Market: Central banks, sovereign funds, public companies, macro allocators.

‍

Problem Solved: Dollar overexposure, reserve diversification, inflation hedging.

‍

El Salvador’s legal tender law (2021) marked the first sovereign-level BTC integration. Following this:

‍

Central African Republic announced BTC-based economic zones.

‍

Bhutan and UAE have explored Bitcoin mining and treasury holding strategies.

‍

Bitcoin Reserve Adoption Tracker: https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/treasuries/ 

‍

These actions suggest BTC could follow gold’s historical trajectory into central bank vaults and sovereign wealth portfolios, particularly in Global South economies vulnerable to dollar dependency.

‍

6. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Web3 Integration

‍

Target Market: Developers, DeFi platforms, cross-chain ecosystems.

‍

Problem Solved: Lack of BTC utility in smart contract environments.

‍

Tokenized BTC (WBTC, tBTC) allows Bitcoin to operate in:

‍

Lending/borrowing (Aave, Compound),

‍

Trading (Uniswap, Curve),

‍

DAOs and NFT platforms,

‍

Yield farming and liquidity provisioning.

‍

DeFi Bitcoin Integration: https://defillama.com/coins/wbtc 

WBTC Custody: https://www.bitgo.com/wbtc 

‍

While synthetic BTC is not base-layer Bitcoin, it expands Bitcoin’s financial reach, letting capital remain in BTC while participating in DeFi productivity.

‍

7. Humanitarian & Dissident Finance

‍

Target Market: Journalists, activists, non-profits, refugees, political dissidents.

‍

Problem Solved: Censorship, asset seizure, restricted banking access.

‍

Bitcoin is increasingly used to fund:

‍

Independent journalism (e.g., Russia, Turkey),

‍

Women’s rights groups (Afghanistan, Iran),

‍

Refugee migration funds (Ukraine, Gaza).

‍

HRF Bitcoin Fund: https://hrf.org/devfund 

Real-World Stories: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/01/13/why-crypto-critical-dissidents 

‍

Unlike banking systems, Bitcoin cannot be blocked, frozen, or seized without physical access to private keys.

‍

8. Lightning Network and Micro-Payments Infrastructure

‍

Target Market: Retail consumers, content creators, app developers.

‍

Problem Solved: Legacy payment bottlenecks for low-value transactions.

‍

Lightning enables:

‍

Streaming payments (e.g., podcasting, content tipping),

‍

Pay-per-use microservices,

‍

Micro donations (below $0.01),

‍

Gaming and social media monetization.

‍

This unlocks new payment primitives previously uneconomical under traditional finance.

‍

Lightning Use Cases: https://lightning.network  | https://amboss.space 

Micropayments in Practice: https://www.stackwork.com 

‍

9. Tokenization Infrastructure and Programmable Finance

‍

Target Market: Financial institutions, token issuance platforms.

‍

Problem Solved: Traditional asset settlement inefficiencies.

‍

Layer 2 solutions like:

‍

Liquid Network (Blockstream),

‍

Fedimint Custody,

‍

DLCs (Discrete Log Contracts),

‍

…enable Bitcoin-based issuance of securities, contracts, and digital instruments without needing a new token.

‍

Liquid: https://blockstream.com/liquid 

Fedimint: https://fedimint.org 

DLCs: https://www.discreetlogcontracts.org 

‍

Bitcoin becomes not just money, but programmable settlement infrastructure.

‍

10. Summary: Bitcoin as a Multi-Sector Solution Layer

‍

Bitcoin’s target market has grown far beyond individual use to encompass:

‍

Finance,

‍

Remittance,

‍

Sovereign policy,

‍

Payments,

‍

Web3,

‍

Humanitarian aid.

‍

Its role is expanding from asset class to economic layer, making BTC not only investable but indispensable in the 21st-century financial paradigm.

‍

References

‍

WTF Happened in 1971: https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ 

‍

World Bank Remittance Report: https://remittanceprices.worldbank.org 

‍

World Bank Global Findex: https://globalfindex.worldbank.org/ 

‍

Chainalysis Index: https://www.chainalysis.com/global-crypto-adoption-index/ 

‍

Strike: https://strike.me 

‍

Bitcoin Beach: https://bitcoinbeach.com 

‍

ZEBEDEE: https://zebedee.io 

‍

WBTC: https://wbtc.network 

‍

Milo Finance: https://www.milocredit.com 

‍

HRF Dev Fund: https://hrf.org/devfund 

‍

BitGo Custody: https://www.bitgo.com/wbtc 

‍

Lightning: https://lightning.network  | https://amboss.space 

‍

Liquid Network: https://blockstream.com/liquid 

‍

Fedimint: https://fedimint.org 

‍

Discreet Log Contracts: https://www.discreetlogcontracts.org 

‍

ETF Tracker: https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/treasuries/ 

‍

Next: Section 5B – Adoption Metrics follows immediately.

‍

Market & Competitive Analysis – Bitcoin (BTC)

B. Adoption Metrics (  – Deep Institutional Analysis)

‍

Adoption metrics serve as critical indicators for evaluating an asset's real-world utility, user demand, market maturity, and future growth potential. In Bitcoin’s case, adoption is not speculative—it is measurable, multifaceted, and progressing across all layers of the global financial and technological stack.

‍

This section presents an institutional-grade analysis of Bitcoin’s adoption curve, using both on-chain data and macroeconomic trends to explore:

‍

User growth rates,

‍

Wallet proliferation,

‍

Geographic expansion,

‍

Institutional penetration,

‍

Developer engagement,

‍

Merchant acceptance,

‍

Infrastructure investment, and

‍

Adoption compared to historical financial technologies.

‍

1. Wallet Growth: The Core Indicator of Retail Adoption

‍

Bitcoin wallet addresses serve as a proxy for user growth. While one user can control multiple wallets, wallet growth correlates closely with increased asset exposure and usage.

‍

As of Q1 2025:

‍

Over 450 million total Bitcoin wallets have been created globally.

‍

Active addresses (~1.2–1.5 million daily) indicate consistent network activity.

‍

Monthly active addresses have steadily grown year-over-year (YoY), even during bear markets.

‍

Source:

‍

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/my-wallet-n-users 

‍

https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/ 

‍

https://glassnode.com/metrics/address/address-active-count 

‍

Wallet usage breakdown:

‍

62% are retail users (<0.1 BTC),

‍

25% are institutional custodial wallets,

‍

13% are exchange wallets.

‍

Wallet growth reflects organic grassroots adoption, uncorrelated to marketing or venture capital subsidies.

‍

2. On-Chain Activity Metrics: Network Usage and Economic Throughput

‍

On-chain transaction data provides deep insight into real economic usage, not just speculative interest.

‍

Key metrics:

‍

Average daily transaction volume (USD equivalent): $15–25 billion.

‍

Transaction count per day (2025 avg.): ~300,000–400,000.

‍

Total on-chain settlement in 2024: ~$8.5 trillion.

‍

Reference:

https://www.blockchain.com/charts/n-transactions 

https://glassnode.com/charts/onchain/usage/tx-volume-adjusted 

‍

Note: Bitcoin settles final, irreversible transactions—making it analogous to a central bank wire layer, not Visa/POS rails.

‍

3. Lightning Network Adoption: The Layer 2 Growth Engine

‍

The Lightning Network enables high-speed, low-cost BTC micropayments.

‍

As of Q1 2025:

‍

~6,200 public nodes,

‍

~110,000 open channels,

‍

Total channel capacity >5,900 BTC,

‍

Transaction volume growing ~35% YoY.

‍

Key adoption indicators:

‍

Strike and CashApp integrated Lightning,

‍

Podcasting 2.0 apps (e.g., Fountain) enable streaming payments,

‍

Emerging markets using Lightning for remittances (Africa, El Salvador, Philippines).

‍

Sources:

https://1ml.com/statistics 

https://amboss.space/ 

‍

Lightning is now a practical payment infrastructure, not a theoretical concept.

‍

4. Institutional Adoption: ETFs, Treasuries, and Custody Platforms

‍

Institutional participation has surged since:

‍

BlackRock, Fidelity, Invesco, Franklin Templeton launched spot BTC ETFs (2024).

‍

Combined ETF AUM surpassed $75 billion within 6 months.

‍

Public companies (e.g., MicroStrategy, Tesla, Block) continue to hold BTC in treasury.

‍

Institutional holdings data 

ETF inflow tracker 

‍

Custodians serving institutional BTC:

‍

Fidelity Digital Assets

‍

BitGo

‍

Anchorage

‍

Galaxy Digital

‍

Institutional inflows now constitute a majority of net new BTC capital inflow.

‍

5. Geographic Adoption Spread

‍

Bitcoin adoption varies by region, with strongest growth in:

‍

Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador): inflation hedge, remittance rail.

‍

Africa (Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya): banking substitute, mobile-first payments.

‍

Asia (Vietnam, India, Philippines): retail accumulation and export settlements.

‍

North America: institutional infrastructure and ETFs.

‍

Global Crypto Adoption Index (Chainalysis)

‍

These regions demonstrate diverse use cases, from savings preservation to humanitarian resilience.

‍

6. Merchant Acceptance and Retail Commerce Integration

‍

Bitcoin is increasingly accepted as payment:

‍

15,000+ merchants globally accept BTC (BitPay, CoinGate, OpenNode),

‍

Major brands testing BTC payments: AMC, Gucci, Microsoft, Newegg, Twitch,

‍

Shopify merchants integrated via BTC payment APIs.

‍

Merchant tools:

https://www.bitpay.com  | https://www.opennode.com  | https://coingate.com 

‍

While MoE use is not mainstream yet, infrastructure is readily deployable and growing.

‍

7. Developer Ecosystem and Protocol Contributions

‍

Developer engagement is a leading indicator of protocol health.

‍

~1,200 monthly contributors across Bitcoin Core, Lightning, and Layer 2 ecosystems.

‍

Major developer funders: Brink, HRF, Spiral (Block), Chaincode Labs.

‍

Protocol upgrades (e.g., Taproot, BIP324) show forward-compatible design evolution.

‍

Dev funding data: https://brink.dev  | https://hrf.org/devfund/ 

Core repository: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin 

‍

Unlike token-funded projects, Bitcoin developers are grant-based, not profit-driven, ensuring mission-aligned code evolution.

‍

8. Bitcoin as a Cultural and Political Movement

‍

Adoption is also ideological. Bitcoin is increasingly adopted as:

‍

A protest against central banking systems,

‍

A tool for financial sovereignty and civil liberties,

‍

A hedge against authoritarian monetary control.

‍

Examples:

‍

#BitcoinFixesThis campaigns,

‍

Bitcoin 2023 conference (Miami) with 35,000+ attendees,

‍

Human Rights Foundation integrations.

‍

This cultural momentum provides resilience beyond price cycles, embedding Bitcoin into global political consciousness.

‍

9. Infrastructure Investment: Mining, Custody, Payment Rails

‍

Massive CapEx in mining and infrastructure reinforces adoption:

‍

Riot Platforms, Marathon, Bitdeer, Iris Energy expanding ASIC fleets.

‍

Data centers and energy partnerships (e.g., Exxon gas flaring → BTC mining).

‍

Multi-billion dollar VC investment in custody tools, on/off-ramps, and BTC rails.

‍

Mining infrastructure reports

‍

10. Adoption vs Historical Technologies: S-Curve Analysis

‍

Bitcoin follows a classic S-curve technology adoption model:

‍

1980s = Internet infrastructure, 1990s = Commercial internet,

‍

2000s = Mobile Internet, 2020s = Digital money infrastructure.

‍

Bitcoin reached Internet 1997-level penetration in 2024, per ARK Invest models. If current CAGR (~60%) continues, BTC users will exceed 1 billion by 2030.

‍

Reference: https://ark-invest.com/big-ideas/bitcoin 

‍

Summary: Bitcoin’s Adoption is a Multi-Layered Global Phenomenon

‍

Bitcoin adoption is:

‍

Broad-based (retail, institutional, sovereign),

‍

Infrastructure-supported (miners, wallets, L2s, custody),

‍

Ideologically driven (freedom money),

‍

Technologically expanding (Lightning, DLCs),

‍

Statistically measurable and accelerating.

‍

It is no longer experimental—it is infrastructural.

‍

References

‍

Wallet Data: https://www.blockchain.com/charts/my-wallet-n-users  | https://glassnode.com/metrics/address/address-active-count 

‍

Lightning Network Stats: https://1ml.com/statistics | https://bitcoinvisuals.com/lightning 

‍

Institutional Holdings: https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/treasuries/ 

‍

ETF Inflows: https://ark-invest.com/newsletters/etf-btc-inflows/ 

‍

Chainalysis Index: https://www.chainalysis.com/global-crypto-adoption-index/ 

‍

Merchant Tools: https://www.bitpay.com  | https://www.opennode.com  | https://coingate.com 

‍

Developer Funding: https://brink.dev  | https://hrf.org/devfund/ 

‍

Mining Infrastructure Report: https://www.coinshares.com/research/bitcoin-mining-network-report 

‍

ARK Big Ideas Report: https://ark-invest.com/big-ideas/bitcoin 

‍

Next: Section 5C – Competitive Landscape.

‍

Market & Competitive Analysis – Bitcoin (BTC)

C. Competitive Landscape ( – Deep Institutional Analysis)

‍

Understanding Bitcoin’s competitive positioning requires a layered approach—one that evaluates not just other cryptocurrencies, but also legacy financial systems, commodities like gold, fiat currencies, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and emerging digital asset classes. As Bitcoin evolves from a speculative asset to a monetary infrastructure layer, its competitors span far beyond altcoins and include traditional instruments and state-sponsored innovations.

‍

This section offers an institutional-grade comparative analysis between Bitcoin and its main rivals—categorized across crypto-native projects, fiat currencies, monetary metals, and state-led digital assets—to assess Bitcoin’s competitive edge and potential vulnerabilities.

‍

1. Bitcoin vs Other Cryptocurrencies (Crypto-Native Competitors)

‍

Bitcoin holds a dominant position in the digital asset ecosystem by market capitalization, adoption, liquidity, and infrastructure maturity. However, it faces competition from protocols offering different functionality:

‍

a. Ethereum (ETH)

‍

Use case: Smart contracts, decentralized applications (dApps), and staking.

‍

Edge over BTC: Programmability and composability.

‍

Weakness vs BTC:

‍

No fixed supply,

‍

Governance vulnerability,

‍

Centralized staking (e.g., Lido),

‍

Higher attack surface.

‍

Reference: https://ultrasound.money | https://ethereum.org/en/staking/ 

‍

b. Solana (SOL)

‍

Use case: High-speed, low-cost DeFi and NFTs.

‍

Edge over BTC: TPS performance.

‍

Weakness vs BTC:

‍

Frequent outages,

‍

High validator centralization,

‍

Inflationary tokenomics.

‍

Reference: https://solana.com/docs/token-economics/overview 

‍

c. Monero (XMR) & Zcash (ZEC)

‍

Use case: Privacy-focused transactions.

‍

Edge: Enhanced anonymity.

‍

Weakness: Lower liquidity, delistings, lower institutional support.

‍

d. Avalanche (AVAX), Polkadot (DOT), Cardano (ADA)

‍

Use cases: Layer 1 competition and interoperability.

‍

Edge: Experimentation with governance and scalability.

‍

Weakness: Unproven monetary durability, token unlock overhangs, complexity.

‍

Bitcoin’s edge: simplicity, security, immutability, and monetary purity.

‍

2. Bitcoin vs Gold: The Hard Money Benchmark

‍

Gold is Bitcoin’s closest analog in traditional markets—both represent non-sovereign, inflation-resistant stores of value.

‍

Gold Market Cap: ~$13.4 trillion (source: https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data)

‍

Comparative advantages of Bitcoin:

‍

Programmable,

‍

Borderless,

‍

Divisible to 1 satoshi,

‍

Easier to store and verify,

‍

Transparent supply.

‍

Gold’s edge:

‍

Centuries-old trust layer,

‍

Central bank reserves,

‍

Lower volatility.

‍

However, gold’s mobility, custody costs, and audit limitations make Bitcoin increasingly attractive as “digital gold 2.0” for modern portfolios.

‍

Galaxy Digital report: https://www.galaxydigital.io/insights/bitcoin-vs-gold/ 

‍

3. Bitcoin vs Fiat Currencies (USD, EUR, CNY)

‍

Bitcoin competes with fiat in terms of:

‍

Purchasing power preservation,

‍

Censorship resistance,

‍

Cross-border usability, and

‍

Inflation neutrality.

‍

Fiat currency limitations:

‍

Centralized control,

‍

Political weaponization (e.g., sanctions),

‍

Debasement through quantitative easing.

‍

USD M2 growth (2000–2024): https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2 

‍

Bitcoin’s edge:

‍

Predictable monetary policy,

‍

Immutable supply,

‍

Non-sovereign neutrality.

‍

However, fiat remains superior in:

‍

Unit of account usage,

‍

Legal tender status,

‍

Immediate merchant network integration.

‍

Bitcoin’s competitiveness here hinges on network effect expansion and volatility management.

‍

4. Bitcoin vs CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies)

‍

CBDCs are state-issued digital currencies. As of 2025:

‍

130+ countries are exploring CBDCs,

‍

China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) is most advanced,

‍

ECB and Fed pilot programs are ongoing.

‍

Source: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/ 

‍

CBDC features:

‍

Programmable money,

‍

Surveillance integration,

‍

Central control over spending.

‍

Bitcoin's competitive advantage:

‍

Permissionless access,

‍

Pseudonymity,

‍

Immutable supply,

‍

Resistance to political misuse.

‍

CBDCs may accelerate Bitcoin adoption among privacy-conscious populations, creating indirect competitive tailwinds.

‍

5. Bitcoin vs Stablecoins (USDT, USDC, DAI)

‍

Stablecoins compete with BTC as MoE and trading collateral.

‍

Advantages:

‍

Price stability,

‍

Easy fiat on-ramp/off-ramp,

‍

Integration with DeFi and fintech apps.

‍

Limitations:

‍

Centralized custodianship,

‍

Regulatory uncertainty,

‍

Vulnerable to depegging (e.g., USDC, UST crises).

‍

Bitcoin is superior as long-term SoV, while stablecoins serve short-term liquidity needs. However, synthetic BTC-stable hybrid models (e.g., BTC-backed stablecoins) may emerge to bridge gaps.

‍

Stablecoin depeg incident 

‍

6. Bitcoin vs Financial Infrastructure (Visa, SWIFT, ACH)

‍

Bitcoin is increasingly compared to payment and settlement networks.

‍

Strengths:

‍

24/7/365 settlement,

‍

Global interoperability,

‍

No intermediary reliance.

‍

Limitations:

‍

Transaction latency (base layer),

‍

Volatility risk for MoE use,

‍

Merchant integration barrier.

‍

Lightning Network narrows these gaps with:

‍

Near-instant payments,

‍

Sub-cent transaction cost,

‍

Developer-first API ecosystem.

‍

SWIFT vs Lightning

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [Email “Coming Soon”]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 17: www.thestandard.io/blog/bitcoin-btc-the-rise-of-cryptocurrency-in-2025-17