Bitcoin (BTC): The Rise of Cryptocurrency in 2025

Page 38

‍

Cited Sources for Section 11.B:

‍

1. https://bitcoinblockhalf.com 

‍

2. https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/crypto-lost-bitcoin/ 

‍

3. https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate 

‍

4. https://www.electriccapital.com/reports/developer-report-2023 

‍

5. https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-bitcoin-spot-etfs-011024 

‍

6. https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/treasuries/ 

‍

7. https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin.html 

‍

8. https://www.coinglass.com/LongShortRatio 

‍

9. https://presidencia.gob.sv/el-salvador-to-launch-bitcoin-bond/ 

‍

10. https://amboss.space 

‍

11. https://stacks.co 

‍

12. https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/articles/bitcoin-investment-thesis 

‍

13. https://ark-invest.com/analyst-research/bitcoin-valuation/ 

‍

Section 11. C: Weaknesses and Risks of Bitcoin (BTC)

‍

Institutional Due Diligence Report – Risk Factors and Structural Limitations

‍

1. High Volatility and Drawdowns

‍

Bitcoin remains one of the most volatile financial assets available. Despite maturing market infrastructure, BTC frequently experiences double-digit intraday price swings and periodic drawdowns of 60%–80% from cycle peaks. Historical data illustrates that every major bull market has been followed by a sharp corrective bear market.

‍

While this volatility creates opportunities for alpha generation, it also introduces considerable portfolio risk for institutions with lower tolerance for mark-to-market fluctuations. Bitcoin’s 30-day rolling volatility has averaged around 60% in recent years—significantly higher than that of equities or gold.

‍

These wild swings may deter pension funds, endowments, and conservative family offices from large allocations without a robust volatility buffering strategy.

‍

2. Regulatory Uncertainty

‍

One of the most significant risks to Bitcoin is the evolving regulatory landscape. While Bitcoin is not classified as a security in most jurisdictions, its use, taxation, and reporting obligations vary widely across borders. Key regulatory risks include:

‍

Potential restrictions on self-custody or peer-to-peer transactions.

‍

Anti-money laundering (AML) crackdowns affecting exchange onramps.

‍

Limitations on Bitcoin mining due to environmental or energy policy concerns.

‍

Mandatory Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements for even non-custodial services.

‍

In the U.S., although Bitcoin enjoys relative clarity under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), broader regulations under the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the SEC, and global central banks could affect infrastructure providers, miners, and wallets.

‍

Unpredictable enforcement trends or harsh taxation could undermine mainstream adoption or erode institutional confidence.

‍

Source: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8487-21 

‍

Source: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Virtual-assets.html 

‍

3. Environmental Concerns and Energy Debate

‍

Bitcoin mining consumes significant electrical energy, drawing intense scrutiny from ESG-focused investors and policymakers. Critics argue that proof-of-work (PoW) mining contributes to carbon emissions and disincentivizes climate change mitigation strategies.

‍

While miners increasingly use renewable energy sources, the optics of high energy consumption continue to tarnish Bitcoin’s public image. According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, Bitcoin mining consumes between 100–140 TWh annually—comparable to small countries like Argentina or the Netherlands.

‍

ESG funds, sovereign wealth funds, and institutional LPs with net-zero mandates may find it difficult to justify a BTC allocation unless ESG narratives are better addressed or energy models are transparently green.

‍

Source: https://ccaf.io/cbeci/index 

‍

Source: https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-market-report-january-2024 

‍

4. Custodial Risk and Technical Complexity

‍

Bitcoin’s security model places a significant responsibility on the holder. While institutional custodians now offer secure vaults, the risk of mismanagement, technical failure, or internal compromise remains.

‍

Self-custody, although ideologically ideal, is operationally complex and risk-prone for non-technical investors. Lost private keys, compromised hardware wallets, or improperly configured multi-sig setups have historically led to irrecoverable asset loss.

‍

Even institutional-grade custody has failed in the past—e.g., failures of exchanges like QuadrigaCX or mismanagement incidents at centralized wallets show the fragility of custody solutions without best-in-class practices and regulatory oversight.

‍

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2019/02/05/quadrigacx-crypto-exchange-may-have-lost-190m-after-founders-death/ 

‍

Source: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/more-than-3-million-bitcoin-lost-forever-new-chainalysis-study-finds 

‍

5. Limited Transaction Throughput

‍

Bitcoin’s base layer remains technically constrained by its conservative block size and throughput design. The network can only process around 7 transactions per second (TPS), compared to thousands in traditional payment systems like Visa or Mastercard.

‍

Although Layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network offer scalability, their adoption remains niche and technically complex. Bitcoin’s on-chain congestion often leads to high fees and slow confirmation times during market surges, undermining its potential for everyday commerce.

‍

While this design prioritizes security and decentralization, it also restricts Bitcoin’s use cases beyond a store of value, potentially ceding ground to more scalable chains in terms of programmability or DeFi.

‍

Source: https://www.blockchain.com/charts/avg-confirmation-time 

‍

Source: https://amboss.space 

‍

6. No Native Yield or Cash Flows

‍

Bitcoin, unlike equities, bonds, or dividend-producing assets, does not generate cash flow or intrinsic yield. While BTC can be used in yield-generating strategies (e.g., lending or DeFi staking), such practices often introduce significant counterparty or protocol risk.

‍

Institutional investors used to discounted cash flow (DCF) models may struggle to justify Bitcoin’s valuation in traditional terms. BTC’s value is derived from its scarcity, utility, and network effect—factors that resist traditional valuation frameworks.

‍

This limitation makes Bitcoin harder to fit into fundamental analysis models and portfolio construction methodologies used by traditional allocators.

‍

7. Attack Surface from Quantum Computing (Theoretical Risk)

‍

A long-term existential risk for Bitcoin lies in the rise of quantum computing. Theoretically, advanced quantum computers could compromise Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography, enabling private key extraction from public addresses.

‍

Although quantum computing at such a scale remains distant (likely post-2035), the mere theoretical possibility introduces a tail risk. Bitcoin’s transition to quantum-resistant cryptography would require complex upgrades and consensus from the community.

‍

Institutions with long-duration holdings must weigh this risk as a black swan event, even if it remains speculative today.

‍

8. Concentration of Mining Power

‍

While Bitcoin is technically decentralized, mining power is still relatively concentrated in large industrial operations and specific geographies. Historically, major portions of hashrate have come from regions with cheap energy—initially China, and now North America and Central Asia.

‍

This centralization creates systemic risk: energy policy changes, geopolitical instability, or infrastructure attacks in key mining hubs could significantly disrupt the network.

‍

Although mining pools distribute rewards across participants, centralization in a few jurisdictions undermines the narrative of full decentralization and exposes the network to localized policy threats.

‍

9. Competitive Technological Landscape

‍

Bitcoin is no longer the sole crypto asset or digital store of value. Competing Layer-1 blockchains (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) and alternative assets (e.g., tokenized gold, stablecoins, CBDCs) offer alternative solutions for programmable money, financial instruments, and settlement layers.

‍

Bitcoin’s lack of native programmability makes it less versatile than smart contract platforms. As DeFi, NFTs, tokenized RWAs, and AI-integrated finance expand, BTC’s static design could become a limiting factor for broader adoption outside of a SoV role.

‍

While Bitcoin’s network effect and security are unmatched, tech-native allocators may prefer more feature-rich assets unless Bitcoin expands functionality through L2 adoption.

‍

Source: https://stacks.co 

‍

Source: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/ 

‍

10. Reputation and Media Perception

‍

Despite its legitimacy in institutional finance, Bitcoin still carries reputational baggage from its early association with illicit markets, darknet usage, and speculative bubbles. Media coverage often paints Bitcoin as volatile, risky, and environmentally destructive.

‍

This perception lingers among certain demographics, policymakers, and legacy finance stakeholders. Reputational friction could slow adoption or trigger political backlash if Bitcoin becomes a scapegoat during financial crises or energy debates.

‍

Institutions must actively manage stakeholder perceptions and ESG narratives when allocating capital to BTC.

‍

Source: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Virtual-assets.html 

‍

Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/cryptocurrency-and-illicit-finance/ 

‍

Cited Sources for Section 11.C:

‍

1. https://www.coinglass.com/Volatility 

‍

2. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8487-21 

‍

3. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Virtual-assets.html 

‍

4. https://ccaf.io/cbeci/index 

‍

5. https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-market-report-january-2024 

‍

6. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2019/02/05/quadrigacx-crypto-exchange-may-have-lost-190m-after-founders-death/ 

‍

7. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/more-than-3-million-bitcoin-lost-forever-new-chainalysis-study-finds 

‍

8. https://www.blockchain.com/charts/avg-confirmation-time 

‍

9. https://amboss.space 

‍

10. https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/articles/bitcoin-fundamentals 

‍

11. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-quantum-computers-could-crack-bitcoin/ 

‍

12. https://stacks.co 

‍

13. https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/ 

‍

14. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/cryptocurrency-and-illicit-finance/ 

‍

Section 11. D: Opportunities in Bitcoin (BTC) Market and Ecosystem

‍

Institutional Due Diligence Report – Growth Vectors and Strategic Upside Catalysts

‍

1. Institutional Capital Inflows

‍

One of the most significant opportunities for Bitcoin lies in the continued influx of institutional capital. Despite its longevity and performance, Bitcoin remains under-allocated across most institutional portfolios. As of 2024, Bitcoin’s total market capitalization hovers around $1.3 trillion—less than 10% of the global gold market, and a mere fraction of global wealth allocation.

‍

If institutional allocators—pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, insurance companies—adopt Bitcoin even minimally (e.g., 1–3% of AUM), the upward pressure on demand could lead to structural price appreciation. Major investment managers like BlackRock and Fidelity entering the BTC ETF market unlock compliant access points for trillions of dollars in capital.

‍

This mainstreaming of Bitcoin via regulated channels reduces friction and accelerates inclusion in traditional asset allocation models.

‍

2. Global Monetary Instability as a Catalyst

‍

The continued fragility of global fiat currencies presents another structural opportunity for Bitcoin. With debt-to-GDP ratios reaching all-time highs in the U.S., EU, Japan, and China, monetary debasement through money printing is becoming the default policy tool.

‍

Bitcoin thrives in this macroeconomic environment as a decentralized, non-dilutable hedge. In emerging markets especially, where inflation can spiral out of control (e.g., Argentina, Turkey, Venezuela), Bitcoin adoption has soared as citizens seek refuge from collapsing fiat regimes.

‍

As more individuals and institutions recognize Bitcoin’s role as a parallel monetary system, its demand base will continue expanding—both at the grassroots and institutional level.

‍

3. Increasing Role in Portfolio Diversification Models

‍

Bitcoin’s relatively low long-term correlation with traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, and real estate makes it increasingly attractive as a portfolio diversification tool. According to research by Fidelity and Ark Invest, adding even a modest Bitcoin allocation (1–3%) enhances risk-adjusted returns by improving Sharpe ratios and reducing portfolio drawdowns during market stress.

‍

This diversification thesis becomes stronger in an era where bonds no longer offer attractive real returns and equities are increasingly correlated due to index fund dominance. Bitcoin represents a rare source of uncorrelated, asymmetric upside—an increasingly scarce asset class in modern finance.

‍

4. The Rise of Bitcoin Layer-2 Ecosystem

‍

A transformative opportunity lies in Bitcoin’s evolving Layer-2 infrastructure. Solutions like the Lightning Network, Stacks, Liquid, and RSK allow Bitcoin to scale beyond its base layer limitations and enter programmable finance domains.

‍

Lightning Network adoption is increasing across both retail and institutional use cases. Applications like Strike and Lightning Labs are building payment rails that rival traditional merchant processors—offering near-instant transactions at near-zero cost.

‍

Moreover, Bitcoin-native DeFi protocols, decentralized identity systems, and smart contracts on Layer-2 solutions expand BTC’s utility far beyond a passive store of value. This ecosystem growth can unlock new revenue models, enhance stickiness, and attract new developer communities.

‍

5. Demographic and Generational Trends

‍

Millennials and Gen Z—who are poised to inherit over $70 trillion in wealth by 2045—are disproportionately pro-Bitcoin. Surveys from Pew Research and Deloitte indicate that younger demographics have higher trust in decentralized financial systems and are significantly more likely to invest in digital assets compared to older cohorts.

‍

As generational wealth transfers progress, Bitcoin stands to benefit from this cultural alignment. Unlike legacy assets, BTC represents a digitally native, censorship-resistant asset that fits the values and consumption patterns of younger investors.

‍

Family offices seeking to future-proof their portfolios will increasingly view BTC as a generational asset aligned with evolving cultural and technological shifts.

‍

6. Expansion into Sovereign and Corporate Treasuries

‍

El Salvador’s bold decision to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender and incorporate BTC into its sovereign treasury strategy may be a harbinger of a new geopolitical era. Other countries with volatile currencies or restricted access to USD-denominated reserves may follow suit—especially in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.

‍

Corporate treasuries are also beginning to explore BTC allocations as part of inflation hedging and diversification strategies. Firms like MicroStrategy, Tesla, and Block Inc. have catalyzed a movement that could see BTC replacing portions of traditional cash, bonds, or gold in treasury portfolios.

‍

As traditional fiat instruments underperform and inflation persists, BTC offers a compelling alternative reserve asset—especially for high-growth tech firms and multinational entities.

‍

7. Advancements in Custody and Risk Management Infrastructure

‍

Institutional-grade custody has improved significantly in recent years, with regulated solutions from Fidelity Digital Assets, Anchorage Digital, Coinbase Custody, and Fireblocks. These providers offer cold storage vaults, insurance coverage, SOC 2 compliance, and audited operational frameworks.

‍

Simultaneously, Bitcoin-native portfolio risk management tools—volatility hedges, derivatives, structured products—are becoming more sophisticated. Institutions can now structure exposure with downside protection, yield enhancements, and active rebalancing strategies.

‍

This maturing infrastructure removes key barriers to entry and makes BTC allocations far more palatable for compliance-sensitive allocators and institutional gatekeepers.

‍

8. Bitcoin ETF International Expansion

‍

While the U.S. spot ETF market has captured attention, there are opportunities for similar products in global markets. Countries like Hong Kong, Canada, Brazil, Australia, and the UK are developing or approving Bitcoin ETFs and ETPs.

‍

This international wave of Bitcoin-linked financial products will democratize access for both retail and institutional investors globally—further increasing liquidity, demand, and network effects.

‍

Such instruments provide regulatory clarity, tax efficiency, and onboarding simplicity—unlocking a vast pool of global capital previously hesitant to enter the crypto space.

‍

9. Growing Merchant and Commercial Adoption

‍

Bitcoin is gradually being adopted by merchants, payment processors, and e-commerce platforms worldwide. Companies like Shopify, PayPal, and Block are enabling BTC payments across large merchant networks.

‍

The Lightning Network also allows microtransactions and cross-border commerce at negligible cost—transforming Bitcoin into a viable payment method even in high-frequency retail environments.

‍

As inflation, de-platforming risks, and credit system fragility increase, Bitcoin presents a robust alternative settlement rail for both small businesses and multinational enterprises.

‍

10. Asymmetric Growth Potential and Global Reserve Asset Status

‍

Bitcoin’s total addressable market remains vast. If BTC achieves only partial parity with gold’s market cap (~$13–15 trillion), it could 10x in valuation from current levels. If it expands into global reserve asset status, its upside could be even greater.

‍

Unlike most assets whose upside is linear or cyclical, Bitcoin’s network effect and scarcity profile create a parabolic growth opportunity. Investors who allocate early to BTC still stand to benefit from a once-in-a-generation asset transition in global finance.

‍

Strategically, Bitcoin offers one of the most compelling asymmetric bets in modern capital markets—where the downside is defined (zero), but the upside potential is transformative.

‍

Cited Sources for Section 11.D – Opportunities

‍

1. Bitcoin ETF Approval: Unlocking Institutional Access – https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/peirce-bitcoin-spot-etfs-011024 

‍

2. Bitcoin’s Role in a Portfolio – https://www.fidelitydigitalassets.com/articles/bitcoin-investment-thesis 

‍

3. Macro Instability and BTC Demand – https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO 

‍

4. Bitcoin Layer-2 Ecosystem Overview – https://stacks.co and https://amboss.space 

‍

5. Millennial and Gen Z Investment Trends – https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/financial-services/articles/wealth-transfer.html 

‍

6. Bitcoin in Sovereign Treasuries – https://presidencia.gob.sv/el-salvador-to-launch-bitcoin-bond/ 

‍

7. Institutional Custody Infrastructure – https://www.anchorage.com/ and https://institutional.coinbase.com/custody 

‍

8. Global Bitcoin ETF Expansion – https://www.reuters.com/technology/bitcoin-etfs-go-global-2024-01-12/ 

‍

9. Bitcoin Merchant Adoption – https://www.shopify.com/blog/bitcoin-payments 

‍

10. Bitcoin Price Potential and Gold Parity Thesis – https://ark-invest.com/analyst-research/bitcoin-valuation/ 

‍

Section 11. E: Threats to Bitcoin (BTC) – External Challenges and Systemic Headwinds

‍

Institutional Due Diligence Report – Macroeconomic, Political, Technological, and Competitive Threats

‍

1. Government and Central Bank Backlash

‍

One of the most existential threats to Bitcoin is the potential for coordinated governmental hostility. While Bitcoin itself cannot be "banned" in a decentralized sense, access to exchanges, custodians, liquidity providers, and fiat on-ramps can be regulated or restricted. This was seen in examples such as China's recurring mining bans, India's uncertain policy stances, and previous U.S. proposals for stringent reporting requirements on self-hosted wallets.

‍

Central banks and monetary authorities may view Bitcoin as a threat to their monetary sovereignty, especially as it becomes a viable alternative to national currencies. The launch of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) across China, the EU, and other nations demonstrates a shift toward digital fiat ecosystems—but these can also be used to undercut Bitcoin adoption by centralizing the digital money narrative.

‍

Widespread CBDC adoption could result in policy incentives (e.g., tax breaks, direct UBI payments) that discourage BTC usage. Simultaneously, anti-money laundering (AML), Know Your Customer (KYC), and anti-terrorism financing laws could be weaponized to stifle privacy-oriented Bitcoin activity.

‍

Source: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/12/03/Central-Bank-Digital-Currencies-Opportunities-Risks-and-Challenges-for-Developing-Countries-511939 

‍

Source: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Virtual-assets.html 

‍

2. Technological Disruption from Superior Blockchains

‍

While Bitcoin is the most secure and decentralized blockchain, it lacks native programmability and suffers from scalability limitations at the base layer. Competing blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche have developed more advanced infrastructure for smart contracts, NFTs, DeFi, and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

‍

If Bitcoin fails to attract developer mindshare and remains overly conservative, it could fall behind in capturing newer use cases like AI-integrated finance, on-chain identity, or decentralized governance systems. Layer-2 solutions like Stacks or Lightning help, but they remain fragmented and less mature than Ethereum’s ecosystem.

‍

In a scenario where Bitcoin retains its store-of-value status but fails to evolve meaningfully, capital could migrate toward more versatile ecosystems—potentially diluting BTC’s total market share in the broader digital asset economy.

‍

Source: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/ 

‍

Source: https://solana.com/developers 

‍

3. Media Narratives and Public Perception Risks

‍

Bitcoin’s public image remains a strategic vulnerability. Despite a growing body of academic literature and institutional advocacy, mainstream media narratives still associate Bitcoin with criminal activity, ransomware payments, speculation, and environmental destruction.

‍

Negative framing in influential media outlets—especially during market crashes or cybercrime incidents—can materially affect adoption rates and institutional enthusiasm. Political lobbying by legacy financial incumbents may also play a role in shaping public opinion and legislative outcomes against Bitcoin-friendly policies.

‍

In a politicized information environment, Bitcoin’s reputation can be damaged by association with bad actors, ideological extremists, or financial crises.

‍

Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/cryptocurrency-and-illicit-finance/ 

‍

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/11/29/pow-under-fire-esg-battle-over-bitcoin/ 

‍

4. Attack Vectors from Quantum Computing (Long-Term)

‍

Quantum computing poses a theoretical but increasingly studied threat to Bitcoin’s cryptographic architecture. Specifically, Shor’s algorithm could, in theory, break the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA) used to secure Bitcoin private keys.

‍

While this threat is not imminent—most estimates place capable quantum systems decades away—Bitcoin’s development roadmap must eventually transition to post-quantum cryptographic standards. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin could make this upgrade socially and technically complex.

‍

The perception of quantum risk, even in its early stages, could affect confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term viability if institutions believe the asset may one day be compromised.

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [ https://discord.gg/K72hed6FRE ]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 39: www.thestandard.io/blog/bitcoin-btc-the-rise-of-cryptocurrency-in-2025-39