Tether (USDT) Investment Analysis – A Comprehensive Report

Page 2

‍

Use Cases Beyond Trading – Payments, Remittances, DeFi: While trading is the primary driver of USDT volume, an important investment highlight is Tether’s expanding use in broader financial contexts. One major growth area is cross-border payments and remittances. Tether’s fast settlement and low fees make it an attractive medium for sending money internationally, especially for the unbanked or those facing high remittance costs. For example, a foreign worker can convert local cash to USDT via a peer-to-peer exchange and send it to family back home, where it’s converted to local currency – avoiding traditional remittance fees that often exceed 5-10%. Tether’s leadership has explicitly positioned USDT as “the dollar for the last mile, for the unbanked”, pointing out that billions of people can now access a digital dollar without a bank account (Stablecoin Tether gets boost as dollar alternative in emerging markets, CEO says | Reuters). This narrative is evidenced by real-world usage spikes: in countries like Nigeria and Ukraine, USDT has been used to move funds amidst economic crisis or conflict when banks were unreliable (Tether's $100 billion stokes stablecoin stability concerns | Reuters). Another realm is Decentralized Finance (DeFi). USDT is one of the top stablecoins used in DeFi protocols for lending, borrowing, and liquidity provision. On lending platforms (e.g. Aave, Compound), investors can deposit USDT and earn yield from borrowers who pay interest to leverage it. Liquidity pools on decentralized exchanges often include USDT (paired with another token) to facilitate trading – liquidity providers earn a cut of fees. Tether’s stability makes it ideal for yield farming because it eliminates the price risk; the returns are in stablecoin terms. According to industry analysis, DeFi yield opportunities on stablecoins like USDT often range from a few percent up to double-digits in certain protocols, depending on demand (How are people getting 10-20% yields on stablecoins lending? : r/defi) (How are people getting 10-20% yields on stablecoins lending? : r/defi). For instance, high-demand lending pools have offered 15–20% APY on USDT during periods of credit hunger, though such rates typically include incentive tokens and come with smart contract risk (How are people getting 10-20% yields on stablecoins lending? : r/defi) (How are people getting 10-20% yields on stablecoins lending? : r/defi). Nonetheless, the prevalence of USDT in DeFi underscores that Tether isn’t just a CEX phenomenon – it’s equally crucial in on-chain finance. Finally, corporate adoption is gradually emerging. Some businesses in crypto-friendly jurisdictions accept USDT for B2B payments or treasury (instead of holding volatile crypto). Tether has also launched tokens pegged to other assets (like EUR₮, CNH₮, and XAU₮ for gold) expanding its product suite, though those are much smaller than USDT. Overall, Tether’s versatility – from facilitating an exchange trade, to enabling a cross-border e-commerce payment, to serving as collateral in a DeFi loan – gives it a broad utility that underpins its value proposition.

Comparison to Competing Stablecoins: Tether operates in a competitive stablecoin market, but it retains clear leadership due to a combination of liquidity, first-mover advantage, and network effects discussed above. Still, investors may wonder how USDT stacks up against alternatives like USD Coin (USDC), Binance USD (BUSD), and Dai (DAI):

• USD Coin (USDC): USDC, issued by Circle and Coinbase, is the second-largest USD stablecoin. It is often touted as a more transparent and regulated stablecoin, with regular attestations and U.S.-based reserves. USDC had grown rapidly and at one point in 2022 reached over $50B in market cap, posing a serious challenge to Tether. However, in 2023 USDC faced a crisis of confidence when some reserves were temporarily trapped in a failed U.S. bank (Silicon Valley Bank), causing USDC to depeg below $0.90 briefly. Meanwhile, Tether had no exposure to that bank and maintained its peg, leading many users to rotate funds from USDC into USDT. As a result, USDC’s market share declined after the U.S. banking crisis in March 2023, while USDT solidified its dominance (State of Stablecoins: 2024). By early 2024, USDC’s market cap was ~$33B versus USDT’s $114B (State of Stablecoins: 2024), and that gap has widened further into 2025. USDC is still preferred by some institutions due to its regulatory clarity (it’s fully reserved in cash and Treasuries with U.S. oversight), but liquidity-wise it lags Tether. Bottom line: USDC offers high transparency and has strong fiat on/off ramps (especially in the U.S.), but USDT offers deeper global liquidity and is more widely used outside U.S. borders.
  
  
• Binance USD (BUSD): BUSD was launched by Binance in partnership with Paxos, with reserves held by Paxos Trust in the U.S. It gained traction as the native stablecoin on Binance exchange. However, in 2023 Paxos was ordered by U.S. regulators to stop issuing BUSD (due to regulatory concerns over Binance’s use of it), effectively putting BUSD into wind-down. BUSD’s market cap subsequently plunged ~90%, from over $20B to under $3B (Tether Takes Lead In Stablecoin Market As Competitors Struggle - Zenger News) (Tether Takes Lead In Stablecoin Market As Competitors Struggle - Zenger News). Many former BUSD users migrated to USDT or other stablecoins. Bottom line: BUSD’s decline actually benefited Tether by removing a competitor. It also highlighted regulatory risk for exchange-affiliated stablecoins.
  
  
• Dai (DAI): DAI is a decentralized stablecoin issued by MakerDAO, backed by crypto collateral (ETH and others) rather than fiat. It’s popular within DeFi due to its decentralization. However, DAI’s supply (~$5B as of 2024 (State of Stablecoins: 2024)) is much smaller, and paradoxically it relies partly on USDC reserves (through Maker’s Peg Stability Module), meaning it’s not entirely independent of centralized stablecoins. DAI’s market share and growth have been modest compared to USDT/USDC. Bottom line: DAI offers an alternative for those avoiding centralized issuers, but its scale and liquidity are limited, and it often trades slightly above $1 (due to higher demand vs supply constraints). It’s not a direct threat to USDT’s dominance in large-scale usage.
  
  
• Others: Smaller fiat-backed coins like TrueUSD (TUSD), Pax Dollar (USDP), and newer entrants occasionally see upticks (TUSD briefly grew when Binance promoted it). But their market caps remain in the low single-digit billions or less. Algorithmic stablecoins (notably Terra’s UST) showed that non-collateralized designs carry high risk – after UST’s collapse in 2022, confidence in algorithmic models waned. New innovations like Frax (partially collateralized) or upcoming CBDCs could change the landscape, but at present none rival USDT’s scale.
  
  

In summary, Tether’s key highlights for investors are its unparalleled liquidity, global adoption, and central role as the “digital dollar” of crypto. It enjoys a network effect that competitors have not matched, giving it pricing stability and utility that is hard to replicate. USDT has become more than just a proxy for USD – in many contexts it is the dollar standard in crypto markets and a critical tool for accessing the world of digital assets (Tether's $100 billion stokes stablecoin stability concerns | Reuters). Its widespread use in trading, payments, and DeFi underscores its versatility. For an investor considering stablecoins, USDT offers the advantage of scale and track record. As we will discuss, this comes with certain trade-offs around transparency, but in terms of raw market presence, Tether remains the premier stablecoin platform, significantly influencing crypto liquidity and capital flows worldwide.

‍

3. Key Risks and Challenges

While Tether’s scale and utility are impressive, investors must weigh several key risks and challenges associated with USDT. Tether’s history has been marked by controversies around its reserves and governance, and the stablecoin space in general faces regulatory and systemic risks. A sophisticated analysis should scrutinize these aspects to fully appreciate the risk/reward profile of holding USDT.

Reserve Transparency and Backing Concerns: The most persistent question hanging over Tether has been: Is every USDT truly backed 1:1 by equivalent reserves? For years, Tether claimed that for every USDT in circulation, $1 was held in its bank accounts. However, investigations revealed that this was not always true. In 2019, Tether’s own legal counsel admitted in a New York court filing that USDT was only about 74% backed by cash and equivalents at that time (Tether Lawyer Admits Stablecoin Now 74% Backed by Cash and Equivalents). This shocking admission – that roughly a quarter of Tether’s supply had no immediate fiat backing – stemmed from Tether having lent a chunk of its reserves (over $800M) to its affiliate exchange Bitfinex, which had lost access to some funds. The New York Attorney General (NYAG) subsequently alleged that “Tether’s claims that its virtual currency was fully backed by U.S. dollars at all times was a lie.” (Attorney General James Ends Virtual Currency Trading Platform Bitfinex’s Illegal Activities in New York) The NYAG’s 22-month investigation concluded in 2021 with Tether settling, paying an $18.5M fine, and agreeing to provide regular reserve disclosures (NY AG’s $850M Probe of Bitfinex, Tether Ends in an $18.5M Settlement) (NY AG’s $850M Probe of Bitfinex, Tether Ends in an $18.5M Settlement). The official findings were scathing: Tether and Bitfinex had “recklessly and unlawfully covered-up massive financial losses to keep their scheme going”, overstating reserves and commingling funds to hide losses (Attorney General James Ends Virtual Currency Trading Platform Bitfinex’s Illegal Activities in New York) (Attorney General James Ends Virtual Currency Trading Platform Bitfinex’s Illegal Activities in New York). For an investor, these revelations underscore a fundamental trust issue – for a stablecoin, nothing is more critical than confidence in the reserves backing it.

Since that legal settlement, Tether has taken steps to improve transparency, but concerns remain. The company now publishes quarterly attestations of its reserve composition (verified by accounting firm BDO Italia). These reports show a breakdown of assets (cash, Treasury bills, loans, crypto, etc.) and have indicated that Tether has built up excess reserves (e.g. as of Aug 2024, $5.3B in shareholder equity above liabilities) (Tether (cryptocurrency) - Wikipedia). Notably, Tether has dramatically changed its reserve makeup over time – responding to criticism, it eliminated all commercial paper holdings by October 2022, which had totaled $30B, and shifted into safer U.S. Treasuries (Tether says it has completely eliminated commercial paper from reserves | Reuters). By end of 2023, about $63B of Tether’s reserves were in U.S. T-bills, with additional holdings in cash, gold ($3.5B), Bitcoin ($2.8B), other investments ($3.8B), and secured loans ($4.8B) (Stablecoin Tether exceeds $100 bln tokens in circulation | Reuters). The reduction of riskier assets (like obscure commercial paper) is a positive development. However, Tether still has not undergone a full independent audit of its reserves (Tether's $109 billion question: Where's the audit?). Its disclosures are attestations (snapshot verifications) rather than comprehensive audits. Top accounting firms have reportedly been unwilling to audit Tether due to reputational risks (Tether's $109 billion question: Where's the audit?). This means that, ultimately, investors are taking Tether Ltd.’s word (backed by limited third-party attestations) that those tens of billions in reserves exist as stated. The lack of a real-time or audited verification is a risk – albeit one that many users have so far tolerated in exchange for USDT’s utility. It’s worth noting that Tether’s executives claim to be working towards an audit and attribute delays to accountants’ cautiousness and the novelty of crypto businesses (Tether's $109 billion question: Where's the audit?). Nonetheless, until a rigorous audit is provided, opacity risk remains: there is a non-zero chance that Tether’s reserves could be misstated or insufficient in a crisis.

Another point is lending and rehypothecation of reserves. Tether in the past engaged in lending some reserves (e.g. to Bitfinex, and potentially to others). Even today, its reports show categories like “secured loans” – which means a portion of reserves is lent out to counterparties for yield. In early 2023, Tether had promised to wind down these loans to zero, but as of Q2 2024 there were still nearly $5 billion of such loans outstanding (Tether still has nearly $5 billion in loans despite pledging to reduce ...) (Tether (cryptocurrency) - Wikipedia). Lending out reserves introduces counterparty risk – if those borrowers default or the collateral falls in value, Tether could find itself under-collateralized. Essentially, Tether at times operates somewhat like a fractional bank (using reserves to earn returns), which is not what risk-averse stablecoin holders expect. A Fortune investigation noted that despite huge profits in 2023, Tether had not fully eliminated its loan program and still had billions lent out, meaning it’s “not even fully backed by USD” if one considers those loans illiquid (Tether's $109 billion question: Where's the audit?) (Tether's $109 billion question: Where's the audit?). The core risk here: if Tether’s asset values or loans take a hit, will it always have $1 for every USDT on demand? The company currently has excess equity ($11+ billion net assets by mid-2024) (Tether (cryptocurrency) - Wikipedia), which provides a cushion, but transparency around the quality and liquidity of all reserve components is crucial. As an investor, it’s wise to monitor Tether’s reserve reports each quarter for shifts in asset quality or any signals of stress.

Regulatory and Legal Risks: The regulatory environment is perhaps the biggest wildcard for Tether’s future. As a pioneer that grew in regulatory gray zones, Tether now faces increasing scrutiny from authorities worldwide. In the U.S., stablecoins have drawn attention from Congress, the Federal Reserve, SEC, and others concerned about investor protection and financial stability. While Tether is not a U.S.-domiciled company (it’s based in the British Virgin Islands), U.S. regulators have still acted when possible – for instance, the CFTC fined Tether $41 million in 2021 for making “untrue or misleading” statements about its reserves (Cryptocurrency Tether is fined $41 million for lying about reserves) (CFTC hits Tether with $41m fine for 'misleading' stablecoin claims), noting that for certain periods in 2016–2018, Tether did not have 100% reserves as claimed. This underscores that U.S. authorities view Tether’s operations as impacting U.S. markets. There are proposals in Congress to regulate stablecoin issuers like banks or require certain disclosures; if enacted, Tether might face the choice of compliance (which could mean more transparency, limited asset types, etc.) or exclusion from U.S. markets. Already, New York State has banned Tether trading for licensed entities as part of the NYAG settlement (Attorney General James Ends Virtual Currency Trading Platform Bitfinex’s Illegal Activities in New York) (Attorney General James Ends Virtual Currency Trading Platform Bitfinex’s Illegal Activities in New York), and other states or countries could follow suit if they view Tether as high-risk or unregistered security (the SEC has not taken action on Tether, but has on some others).

‍

Thank you for taking the time to read this article. We invite you to explore more content on our blog for additional insights and information.

https://www.thestandard.io/blog  

‍

"If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [Email “Coming Soon”]. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing from you."

‍

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE

PAGE 3: www.thestandard.io/blog/tether-usdt-investment-analysis---a-comprehensive-report-3